Synap founder Dr James Gupta argues that online exams should apply risk-based, proportionate security rather than maximum surveillance across every assessment. He warns that excessive monitoring can undermine legitimacy, damage candidate trust and create legal exposure while doing little to strengthen integrity, pointing to increasing regulatory scrutiny of intrusive practices. The piece promotes privacy-by-design, transparency and governance-led frameworks that balance integrity with fairness and accessibility, reflecting Synap's approach to secure assessment.
- News & press
- /Balancing Integrity, Trust and Surveillance in Exams
OpinionSecurity Journal UK · May 2026
Balancing Integrity, Trust and Surveillance in Exams
More monitoring does not guarantee more integrity, and can carry real trust and legal costs.
Read the original on Security Journal UK ↗ Read the full piece on Security Journal UK ↗
This is a short summary — the full article lives on Security Journal UK.
See the platform behind the coverage
Book a tailored demo and we’ll show you how Synap delivers rigorous, secure assessment.