In this opinion piece, Synap founder Dr James Gupta argues that piling on surveillance does not automatically make an online exam more trustworthy, and can instead erode candidate confidence, raise accessibility issues and invite legal challenge. He makes the case for proportionate controls that scale to the stakes of each assessment, embedding integrity into exam design and following privacy-by-design principles. The article reflects Synap's position that credible digital assessment depends on transparency and appropriate governance rather than maximum monitoring.
- News & press
- /The Ethics of Online Exams: Designing Proportionate Security Controls
OpinionFE News · June 2026
The Ethics of Online Exams: Designing Proportionate Security Controls
Why matching exam security to actual risk protects both integrity and candidate trust better than blanket surveillance.
Read the original on FE News ↗ Read the full piece on FE News ↗
This is a short summary — the full article lives on FE News.
See the platform behind the coverage
Book a tailored demo and we’ll show you how Synap delivers rigorous, secure assessment.